This essay is a revised version of a review published in the March 1988 
issue of "Artforum" magazine which appeared in a small 
catalogue/announcement for the exhibition "Joseph Nechvatal" which was held 
at Anders Tornberg Gallery in Lund, Sweden in 1989.
In a manic proliferation of communication, Joseph Nechvatal's over-mediated 
language streams across the viewer's info fried consciousness as a miasma of 
fuzzy, fleeting, and overlapping images. The result is something like 
receiving television signals from several stations and data-banks 
simultaneously on a single screen and trying to read the tangled web of 
electronic blips and blobs for whatever subliminal truths can be found 
there.
One way to look at Nechvatal's development since his first shows in NYC 
alternative spaces in the 1970s would be in terms of the various media with 
which he has chosen to work; making major shifts in presentation without 
markedly altering his art's complex graphic structure which is based 
primarily on telecommunications and its technology. However, the succession 
of pencil drawing, photocopying, photography, re-photography, sculpture, and 
computer-robotic assisted painting tells only part of the story.
Over the past few years, Nechvatal's art, while remaining stylistically 
consistent with his earlier work, has undergone a transformation of no minor 
significance. Although his post-modern tea leaves will always be open to 
different interpretations, he appears to have moved away from direct 
socio-political assault and more into a hyper-sensory sublime.
In 1984 Nechvatal described himself as an agitator in an information war 
being conduted over the viability of nuclear force in terms of the Cold War. 
What concerned him was the psychic numbing that came about through the 
ever-present possibility of nuclear annihilation. Of his process of 
art-making he said, "I tend to degenerate archetypal media images. I rip off 
images from the media ... then destroy/transform them in the interests of 
unintelligible beauty". This process involved appropriating media-images, 
entering them into his "data pool" by tracing them one upon another, and 
then further transforming them by breaking them down, contaminating and 
sublimating them in the obscurity of gray stratums and abstract marks so as 
to style what he called "pictures that do not look like pictures".
In his recent work (1986-7), the degenerated images (now fabricated via 
computer-robotics) form a vibrant surface that is less legible than ever. 
Its self-consuming intensity digests its own content, which has become 
tangible only as a transmission of unconscious ideas that never quite 
convene. The social issues end up as sediment left in a cathartic rinse.
As a reaction against the soullessness of contemporary simulation, Nechvatal 
has deliberately sacrificed his polemical armor to find his own notion of 
autonomy. He has abandoned diatribe and irony in favor of mystery; thus 
finding a way out of the ideologically oppressive dead end of 
Post-Modernism.
Post-Modern criticism only thinly disguises the redundancy of long-exhausted 
and facile material. Nechvatal's alternative is not a conservative 
Post-Modern regression into the clichés of romantic expression but a 
building - from the rubble of our deconstructed signs - another "expansive" 
state of consciousness. What matters is the viewer's expansive play of the 
imagination - a point that Nechvatal once made by quoting the TV character 
Edith Bunker (from "All in the Family") on modern art when she said, "It's 
not what you see, it's what you think you see."
Over the years Nechvatal has exposed and examined the infrastructure of our 
contemporary information network, and with his latest efforts he has begun 
to seek a deeper and more expansive understanding of its underlying 
mysteries. Since 1986, when Nechvatal made the seamless, yet dramatic, shift 
in his medium by allowing the computerized-robotic apparatus to subjugate 
the artist's hand (the last vestige of individualistic self-identity our 
culture desperately clings to) there has been a startling new sense that in 
his losing this self-conceiving gesture of humanness to the digital (it is 
the action of art-making, rather than the visual or material aspects of art, 
which signify for many the presence of an organic soul), he has somehow 
found something else entirely - something perhaps even more of what we'd 
call a heightened sensation or awareness of the self.
Contrary to the innate suspicions of hysteric technophobia, the art of 
industry Nechvatal has given himself up to has not reduced the sum quantity 
or intensity of meaning, viscerality, visual complexity, or perceptual depth 
which artificial production supposedly can't translate or fully simulate 
from the realm of real life experience. While contemporary art persists in 
expressing the mass efforts of technological animation and proliferation in 
society as an aesthetics of cold, alienated and disembodied minimalism or 
kitsch; Nechvatal has shown an even greater tendency toward pictorial 
saturation than before - and a gothic self-referentiality that transmutes 
the banal into a baroque fugue of intoxicating excess.
Ultimately, the transcendence offered by Nechvatal's computer-robotic 
assisted paintings is a descent into lower, darker, more deeply buried 
stratas hitherto mostly denied by rational Science. Such a recess is - if we 
were to trace it on the invisible chart of the imagination's cosmology - an 
abandoned recline across the pictorial axis of participation. That is, 
whereas the potency of Nechvatal's earlier work effectively drew us into the 
well of lust and loathing for the intemperate and immortal man-machine, he 
could never completely hurl us into the sensual throes of its demonic-erotic 
grip until recently because his own fascination was always measured across 
some palpable distance of voyeuristic reflection. However, as these images 
evince, Nechvatal has now fully submerged himself (and us) into the 
forbidden repose of industry's telesthetic mania. He's married the 
machine-monster of our dreams and consummated the original bio-technic sin 
of Modern Man with a passionate leap into the hallucinatory abyss of 
civilization's reviled man-hole: excess. An adoration of the screen as the 
anima of electrically alive hyper-space, Nechvatal's ecstatic excess is a 
union of faith and science anchored in hyper-sensory experience. For all his 
technological, semiotic, and aesthetic virtuosity, his greatest weapon is 
ecstasy itself.
Carlo McCormick
NYC 1987